Deaconess Foundation takes a "blank slate" approach when revisting reporting. While the organization has climbed a pretty steep learning curve when it comes to employment grantmaking, both the staff and board share an eagerness to get better.
New York Foundation’s approach to reporting is intentionally streamlined and is known for funding organizations in their earliest stages and groups operating with limited resources.
To be most effective, grantmakers need to think about those practices that matter most to nonprofits and how their behavior impacts the nonprofits they serve. GEO has been working hard to listen and learn from nonprofits around the country to better understand what grantmakers can do to help them achieve better results.
What if we told you that one of philanthropy’s most ubiquitous practices is nearly always a burden to nonprofits and a disappointment to funders?
Wrap-up for the Spring 2018 Issue of PEAK Insight Journal: Revisit Reporting. For further reading, check out these resources.
While a necessary component of a funder-grantee relationship, reporting typically engenders about as much excitement as a cupful of cod liver oil. Just hold your nose for a few seconds (or in this case, a few months or more), swallow, and it will be over.
When it comes down to actual practice, does our design and use of reporting match our intentions?
While there is a nearly universal belief that grant reports are necessary, there is far less agreement about frequency and format, required elements, and uses (never mind, usefulness!).
Missed Opportunities to Build Trust and Strengthen Relationships with Grant Partners
“This survey has gotten me to think about ways that I can improve our reporting templates. Rather than vaguely asking grantees to report on their progress toward their research aims, I think that I could improve our reporting templates by asking more directed questions…” 2017 Revisit Reporting Survey Comment Like the funder above, many of us take grant reporting, well, for granted. The fact is: for grantmakers and grant recipients alike, the process can feel inevitable. Grantmakers make grants, recipients say thank you, and about a year later (sometimes much more frequently), the recipient says thanks again, and writes several